June, 2005
WHAT FUTURE FOR THE BUILDING INDUSTRY?
Commenting on the recent report by the Adult Learning
Inspectorate, Building the Future, on skills training in the building
industry, Neil Turner, managing director of Bovey Construction,
said: “It seems to be that we’re not so much building
the industry’s future as taking it apart brick by brick.”
According to the report, the industry is currently
short of 300,000 skilled workers it needs to complete contracts
already planned. Yet, only 34 per cent nationally of National
Vocation Qualification trainees complete their NVQ level 2, now
accepted in the building industry as the minimum skills level.
This means that not only will a high proportion of these contracts
finish late, but we also have an escalating skills crisis.
For the Ashburton firm, where 70 per cent of site
workers have a level 2 or 3 qualification and all site managers
have, or are working towards, a management NVQ, it is the long-term
message that is really concerning. “As an Investor in People
company, we are very committed to training here – and you
have to be, as far as NVQs are concerned, as they are very bureaucratic.
And yet my men complain of unfocused courses with too little time
spent on trade skills.”
This supports the report findings, where employers
complained of bureaucracy and inflexibility. The problem, according
to Mr Turner, is that NVQs come as part of a Modern Apprenticeship
package, designed primarily for school-leavers. “In theory,
employers can request that their staff drop the add-on units and
focus on trade skills, but this doesn’t happen. This inflexibility
could explain the high drop-out rate.”
The problem, according to Mr Turner, is that the
training has become a catch-all, resulting in casualties particularly
among more mature workers. Not only is there the employed worker
who wants a streamlined, focused course in order to upgrade his
skills, but there is the unresolved issue of those who have experience
and skills, but need the piece of paper that proves this. “The
existing NVQ fails both these groups.”
One option is for employers who want their staff to have specialised
training - and the necessary NVQ - is to set up on-site assessment
and training, where the employer provides the training and college
validators and assessors monitor it. But this is time-consuming
for the employer, whose primary function is to run a profitable
business.
Asked to comment on these issues, Peter Mercy,
head of construction at South Devon College, said: “Construction
NVQs are designed round the needs of companies and we believe
they achieve a balance between work and college-based evidence.
“I appreciate the problems encountered by
experienced workers whose prior skills and learning are not fully
acknowledged at present. To resolve this, South Devon College
is considering piloting the Experienced Workers’ Assessment,
whereby candidates attend college purely to have skills assessed
and to complete a portfolio of evidence. This could be ideal for
experienced staff, as it streamlines the process.”